Project Opus

Already a member? SIGN IN HERE.
Username:  Password: Forgot your password?
Sign up as a FAN or ARTIST.

Prince plans to sue YouTube for unauthorized use of songs

Submitted by Stephen Abbott on Sat, 2007-09-15 21:42.
Category: Editorial

Doing the unexpected is exactly what we expect Prince to do, and rebellious artists who have fully embraced the new music economy don't tend to fall on the same side with the major labels. Prince has fought the absurdities of the record business at every turn, and even changing his name to an unpronouncable symbol to get around a clause that limited the amount of music he could produce. He released music of his own website without the help of the major label marketing machine. His antics are not popular among record label executives, so it would be easy to assume that Prince wouldn't been on the same side of the copyright battle as the label supported efforts of the RIAA.

So Prince's recent plans to sue YouTube, Pirate Bay and others for unauthorized use of his music would seem a little out of character for the quirky 49 year old artist. After all, it's only been a couple months since the London Times gave away his latest album as part of a promo.

But it's not out of character. He just has a different perspective.

Above everything else, Prince has always been an artist who fully respects his craft. Like his music or not, you can't deny his talent and success. In a statement released by Prince:

U.S. pop star Prince plans to sue YouTube and other major Web sites for unauthorized use of his music in a bid to reclaim his art on the Internet. "YouTube ... are clearly able (to) filter porn and pedophile material but appear to choose not to filter out the unauthorized music and film content which is core to their business success," a statement released on his behalf said.Reuters

So is courtroom Prince the next version of courtroom Metallica? Is one artist going to make a difference in what seems to be a lost battle against pop culture?

Metallica took a lot of heat in their fight against Napster. Some fans may have sympathized with the millionaire metal heads, but their arguments didn't fly with most people. Napster flourished and then collapsed as the poster child for piracy, but it forever changed the face of the music business. Now YouTube is changing the way people experience the "art", and Prince seems ready to take one for the team.

No one is overly sympathic. Or at least they haven't spoken out yet. Check out Digg to see an overwhelming backlash against him. Even the legal team behind this effort have admitted it's a bit futile. They could remove hundreds, and the next day more would appear. But I believe that Prince isn't really looking for a victory. Like his name change stunt, this is as much about making a point to the business as it is the removal of content.

login or register to post comments | delicious delicious | digg digg

Jeremy Lim I remember my reaction when
Written by Jeremy Lim on Mon, 2007-09-17 10:56

I remember my reaction when I first read the headline.

My head cocked to the side, and I stared blankly at the screen a moment before muttering, "... you're kidding me."

As I write this, my head is still cocked to the side and my gaze just as vacant. I'm either sleep deprived, or I'm really tired of all of this law suit crap. Maybe a little bit of both.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the content filtering mechanism on YouTube is run by the community (you can flag videos as inappropriate). I don't think it's that they choose not to, but I don't think they can.

What point is he really trying to make to the business? It looks like he's fighting what he's advocated in the past - new ways to gain exposure. It smells like a publicity stunt to me. It's not even a new argument. I think a lot of people have blinders for anything associated with a law suit.

I might just be grumpy, but blah Prince. Blah.

uberbelly Smells like Prince Spirit
Written by uberbelly on Mon, 2007-09-17 12:00

Quote:
It smells like a publicity stunt to me.

I don't know the sales stats but it's probably because his new album has basically tanked and he's just looking to stay on the radar.

David All albums are tanking
Written by David on Mon, 2007-09-17 13:07

It's not just Prince. Any artists putting out an album when the industry is contracting 30-50% is going to tank. Van Halen could put out an album for their highly anticipated upcoming tour and it too would tank.

I think although artists are going to be (they already are) much more willing to let people "play" with their music in other ways, there is still an issue around moral rights. Sure play with it, but that doesn't mean you can do ANYTHING. The Village People do not want their music mixed with Nazi Footage. , even in parody.

Name of User If bands go after youtube
Written by cman on Mon, 2008-04-21 09:32

If bands go after youtube for a few hundred videos of theirs or fewer what about all the personal blogs with videos or fan sites with the videos there are probably more across the net for bands then just on youtube. Granted more viewers are on youtube but it's not going to stop someone from going to a concert or getting a CD it's just a bad quality video and bad sound thats it get over it, were not in the 80's where your going to be selling VHS's copies of your concerts. I just got some james tickets and im sure a few days later it'll be on youtube.

Carlito and the Che Wah Wahs A fair days pay
Written by Carlito and the Che Wah Wahs on Wed, 2008-04-23 04:22

Artist: I create this material and I offer it to you at a price

Consumer: Why should I pay for it when I can get it free from the internet, in a multitude of forms.

Artist: Good point. Still , if I can't get paid for my artistic endevours guess I may as well go stack shelves at Primark to pay the bills.

Consumer: Fine, there's plenty of artists I can listen to instead of you!

Artist: Guess so, but how long are they going to carry on producing quality stuff once the money dries up?

Consumer: Then I'll just go and see them live, thus promoting live music!

Artist: And pay a premiium for entry? Economies of scale mean playing live is only going to be worthwhile for an artist that can command stadium size audiences.

Name of User It still amazes me that
Written by hectorsmirnoff on Sat, 2008-05-24 11:45

It still amazes me that artists such as Prince are getting so involved in these court battles against these media behemoths. It obviously is not about the money but there must be an issue of pride which i'm sure Prince is not short of at all.
I don't get this guy, he plays every instrument under the sun, the guitar, piano, violin, cello anchor, the french horn and who knows what else. I think if I were in his position that I would want to share as much as my music as possible with as many people as possible. Like I said: pride.

David Well I think Fear has more to do with it.
Written by David on Sat, 2008-05-24 13:39

Prince and most professional musicians today have been reared in the old school model. They do not understand what is happening with music consumption and they do not see the possibilities with new models. I think that is to be expected. Touring musicians and composers feared what the phonograph was going to do to their businesses. They resisted it with heart and soul.

Still I think it's understandable for an artists to want to exercise their moral rights on how their work is being used.